RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01953
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The date of the order assigning him from Kunsan Air Base, Korea,
to Dover Air Force Base (AFB), Delaware (DE) be changed from
30 August 2012 to 20 July 2012 so he can receive reimbursement
for moving his family and household goods (HHG) from Virginia
(VA) to Delaware (DE).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He filed for a change of orders stating his family was in
Chesapeake, VA, when he was making his permanent change of
station (PCS) from Korea. He received an amendment updating his
familys address because he was miscounseled by the personnel at
Charleston AFB, South Carolina (SC), and in order to receive
reimbursement for moving his family from VA, the issuance date
has to read a date before he physically moved his family.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).
Per Special Order AE-107419, dated 29 June 2011, the applicant
was reassigned on a PCS from Charleston, SC, to a one-year
unaccompanied tour at Kunsan Air Base, Korea, with a subsequent
follow on assignment to Dover AFB, DE. An amended order (AE-
112569) was issued on 13 July 2011, indicating the following:
the family would move to Chesapeake, VA; member was authorized
travel to a designated place (Chesapeake, VA) to assist in the
moving of dependents; and HHG shipment transportation and/or
assist dependents transportation authorized by the Joint Federal
Travel Regulation (JFTR). Incident to the PCS, the applicant
effected and received payment for the personally procured move
(PPM) of HHG from Charleston, SC to Chesapeake, VA, to Dover AFB,
DE. However, he was denied reimbursement for the PPM because it
was accomplished prior to the issuance of the PCS order
reassigning him from Kusan Air Base, Korea, to Dover AFB, DE.
Special Order AF-132346, dated 30 August 2012, reassigned the
applicant from Korea to Dover AFB, DE. Amended Order AG-033513,
dated 11 January 2013, changed the current location of dependents
from Dover, DE, to Chesapeake, VA.
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants
military service records, are contained in the Air Force
evaluation at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
PPA HQ/ECAF recommends approval. ECAF states that Joint Federal
Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume 1, Paragraph U5350-D, authorizes
HHG and dependent transportation to a designated place in the
Continental United States (CONUS) for members who are transferred
by PCS to serve an Outside Continental United States (OCONUS)
dependent restricted tour. Upon completion of the restricted
OCONUS tour, shipment of HHG and dependents are authorized from
the designated location to the subsequent duty station. Air
Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2110, Attachment 5, Figure A.5.1,
Follow-on Agreement, reflects a cost savings program for Air
Force members when they are reassigned to a short tour OCONUS.
Under the follow-on program, a member, who is assigned to a short
tour OCONUS, receives knowledge of the subsequent assignment
prior to going to the OCONUS assignment, if he/she agrees to
either leave the dependents and HHG at the current duty location
or move them directly to the follow-on location (saves government
funds by not moving dependents and HHG to a designated location,
then to the subsequent duty station upon completion of overseas
tour). Movement of HHG and dependents to a location other than
the follow-on location jeopardizes the member receiving the
follow-on assignment.
ECAF indicates that based on the information in the case file, it
appears the rules to qualify for the follow-on program were not
properly explained to the applicant. He moved dependents and HHG
to a designated location versus the follow-on location.
Additionally, the order issuing authority issued amended order
AE-112569, authorizing movement of dependents and member to the
designated location of Chesapeake, VA, which also did not meet
the intent of the program. Although the disapproval for
reimbursement for PPM from VA to DE was based upon the property
being moved prior to receipt of orders, they believe the
applicant performed the move at that time because of erroneous
counseling and information presented when applying for the
follow-on program. Therefore, they believe the applicant should
be reimbursed for the PPM of his HHG from Chesapeake, VA, to
Dover, DE. Should the Board agree, they recommend changing the
records to reflect that under competent authority, the date of
issuance for Special order AF-132346, reassigning the applicant
from Kunsan Air Base, Korea, to Dover AFB, DE, was dated 1 July
2012; thereby, authorizing reimbursement for the PPM from
Chesapeake, VA to Dover, DE.
The complete PPA HQ/ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 17 June 2013, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
D). As of this date, this office has received no response.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
corrective action. We took notice of the applicants complete
submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with
PPA/ECAFs determination that the applicant should be reimbursed
for the personally procured move (PPM) of his HHG from
Chesapeake, VA, to Dover, DE. In this respect, we agree the
applicant may not have been provided appropriate counseling
concerning the follow-on program. Therefore, we concur with the
relief recommended by PPA/ECAF. Accordingly, we recommend the
applicants record be corrected as indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that Special
Order AF-132346, reassigning him from Kunsan Air Base, Korea to
Dover, Delaware, was issued on 1 July 2012 rather than 30 August
2012; thereby, authorizing reimbursement for his personally
procured move from Chesapeake, Virginia, to Dover, Delaware.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-01953 in Executive Session on 6 February 2014,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-
01953 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Apr 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, PPA HQ/ECAF, dated 31 May 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jun 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02500
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02500 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the necessary documentation for approval of the personally procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG) during a permanent change of station (PCS) move. ECAF states the applicant indicates he should be reimbursed for three primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00053
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends granting relief, indicating sufficient evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Additionally, Personal Property Headquarters (PPA HQ) advisories PPA-10-0034 and PPA 13-0045, dated 16 Apr 10 and 5 Jun 13, respectively,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03947
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service records, are contained in the Air Force evaluation at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/CCC recommends approval. Based on information in the case file, it appears erroneous information received regarding authorization for shipment prior to issuance of orders resulted in an injustice against the applicant, and their office concurs that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00423
His PCS order was issued on 10 August 2012. When he attempted to file his paperwork with the TMO he was told that he was not entitled, as the shipment was made prior to issuance of the PCS order. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that competent authority issued a Letter-in-Lieu of order dated 20 July 2012, and the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03475
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA/ECAF recommends approval. Incident to the PCS, the applicant effected a shipment of HHG at government expense, and personally arranged to ship his motorcycle to the Philippines. However, the motorcycle qualifies as HHG and he was authorized to ship it to the Philippines as HHG.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00067
He initiated shipment of household goods prior to this temporary duty (TDY) assignment in order to alleviate stress on his wife and because of the short time frame between his return from TDY and permanent change of station (PCS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/ECAF recommends partial relief. The complete PPA HQ/ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01577
ECAF states the JFTR requires that a members incentive be based upon 95 percent of the GCC, and at the time of the applicants shipment, the GCC was based upon the best value rates reflected in the DPS. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a PPM, he was fully compensated for his move and in reality received a de facto incentive through remission...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02068
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04133
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04133 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders issue date be changed to on or before 1 Jun 08 so that he can be reimbursed for his Do-It- Yourself (DITY) move. Even though his orders were being amended to reflect the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01499
The applicant completed a DD Form 2278, Application for Do-it-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, and was quoted an estimated incentive payment of $19,524.78 to personally procure his move. Based on that amount, the applicant was given an advance payment of $12,331.44. ECAF recommends the applicant be reimbursed for any funds personally expended in excess of the authorized GCC.